I Should Stop Hidin’ From Haydn

Franz Joseph Haydn is one of the three giants of the Viennese Classical Style of music, along with Mozart and Beethoven.  The works of these three men, in a style of music from the late eighteenth century, are still some of the most studied, recorded,  and performed works in the genre of “classical” music today.  Before any of my country-folk here in America can heckle me with sentiments like, “Why would anything from the 1700’s  relate to my life today?”, I would ask my fellow citizens to tell me what year the Constitution of the United States was written.  You know, that document that the highest court in the land parses to decide some of the most important cases of our time.  Age is not a disease, and history has a way of highlighting the best and strongest contributions of an era.  We don’t record music on eight-track tapes anymore, but we are still recording Beethoven Symphonies and always have, on vinyl LP, cassette tape, compact disc, mp3, Itunes and will continue to record them on whatever is state-of-the-art next.

The late eighteenth century was the Age of the Enlightenment, and the intellectual and aesthetic influence of Enlightenment thinking on music is summed up by Professor Robert Greenberg in a quote from his lectures How to Listen to and Understand Great Music:

The Enlightenment’s impact on musical style was enormous. The Enlightenment’s new spirit of individualism was reflected in the more melodically and expressively flexible Classical-era style. The Enlightenment belief that the best music is that which appeals to the greatest number resulted in a doctrine of accessibility that evoked Classical Greek aesthetic, focusing on clarity and beauty of line (melody), balance and purity of form (clear phrase structures and carefully wrought musical forms), and expressive restraint and good taste.

One of the biggest contributions of Haydn and the Viennese Classical Style to instrumental music is Sonata Form.  Sonata Form goes by a couple of names in textbooks, but whether you call it “Sonata-Allegro” form or “first movement form”, you will find it in almost all forms of instrumental music from small to large from this time.  Charles Rosen gives the best one sentence description of the school book recipe for Sonata Form in his book The Classical Style:

The account {of Sonata Form} (misleading in a number of ways) generally goes somewhat as follows: the exposition starts with a theme or group of themes in the tonic, followed by a modulation to the dominant and a second group of themes; after a repetition of the exposition comes the development, in which the themes are fragmented and combined in various keys ending with a return to the tonic and a recapitulation of the exposition, this time with the second group of themes in the tonic, and an optional coda.

After being a dutiful student and learning this Jello-mold framework view of Sonata Form, I set out to look at some of the musical output of the Classical Period and hit a bit of a roadblock with Haydn.  This composer is one of the Big Three of the age, giving us 106 symphonies, 68 string quartets, 62 piano sonatas in addition to masses, oratorios, operas and more.  Men by the names of Landon and Hoboken have made entire careers of simply cataloging Haydn’s music.  I thought if I looked at one of the most important composers of the age, and searched for the most important musical form of the age, I would find dozens of perfect examples of Sonata Form.  I owned the decoder ring, and should be able to understand everything about Haydn’s first movements.  Needless to say, I was quite wrong.

Monotheism.  That was the first roadblock I encountered in starting to learn the music of Haydn.  He wrote many of his Sonata Allegro movements with only ONE theme.  I was armed with the understanding that Sonata form presented two themes, one in the tonic and the next in the dominant, then mixed them together in the development and resolved everything in the recapitulation by having both themes in the home key.  How can you bloody well make a Sonata form with only one theme?  You have no second theme to contrast it with.  What do you mix together and chop up in the development?  You have nothing to move back to the home key in the recap?  In truth, this was only the first way I found that Haydn deviated from my student understanding of Sonata form, and eventually I listened to less and less Haydn.  There was an ocean of musical works by Franz Joseph, and I had no way of sorting out which ones I could make sense of and which would remain a mystery.  I moved on to Beethoven, because that dude only had 9 symphonies and 16 string quartets which seemed like a smaller body of water to get lost in.  (I was wrong about Beethoven too.)

The problems I was having in understanding Haydn’s music were not the fault of Haydn, but rather the inadequacy of my understanding of Sonata Form.  Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven would likely not even recognize that school book description of the process.  The Wikipedia version of Sonata Form actually stems from the writings of music theorist from the NINETEENTH century, men by the names of Antonin Reicha, Adolph Bernhard Marx (no relation) and Carl Czerny.  Czerny had the most influence with his book School of Practical Composition written in 1848.    All three of these men were part of the deification of Beethoven in the middle 1800’s, and were writing handbooks and guides for composing new music with generalizations from the early works of Beethoven. Those generalizations were collected as the things most important to the aesthetics of the nineteenth century, and frankly the things one might be able to successfully copy from early Beethoven.  What this definition of Sonata Form is NOT is a good historical understanding of the thought process of composers of the Classical period.  The school book definition of Sonata Form, making things into  a bundt cake pan of ingredients, doesn’t do justice to the process or practice of the composers of the Classical Period.

I recently stumbled upon the Opus 50 String Quartets of Haydn, a set of six quartets dedicated to the King of Prussian.  Most of the reason I steered myself to these “Prussian” quartets was finding a copy of the Cambridge Music Handbook on the works by W. Dean Sutcliffe. Looking closer at this set of pieces by Haydn has inspired in me a renewed interest in theories of Sonata Form.  The volume on the subject Sonata Forms by Charles Rosen is truly indispensable, because he never loses a historical context and connection to actual musical examples when discussing the practice of composers in the Classical Period and beyond.  The sort of linear analysis of Heinrich Schenker is very influential, but often critiques form as simply a foreground manifestation of an underlying contrapuntal-harmonic motion.  (It seems Schenker heard everything as a prolongation of a basic I-V-I progression, at least any music worth listening to 🙂 ) In theoretical discussions of Sonata Form, there is a tonal-polarity model, a tour-of-keys model, a very interesting book by William Caplin on Classical Form that I am working through and a very powerful volume by James Hepokoski and Warren Darcy on Elements of Sonata Theory that I hope Amazon delivers to me soon.  One of the most interesting points about the music of the eighteenth century I found was in John Irving’s book on the Mozart string quartets dedicated to Haydn:

Topical associations represent a dimension of meaning for the music of Mozart’s time that was almost wholly lost during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and which has only in recent times regained the attention of musicologists, most especially Leonard Ratner.  ‘Topics’ were recognisable ‘codes’ according to which music was both composed and understood and thus provided a contest for communication between the composer, the performer and the listener in the classical period – a kind of musical vernacular.

When I started listening to the first quartet in Haydn’s Opus 50, this thought of some “topical association”, a specific meaning associated with a musical gesture became very useful to my understanding of Haydn’s personality peeking through the first movement.  Haydn was a man of considerable wit and humor.  The opening of the B flat Quartet, Opus 50 number 1 has the cello playing eight quarter notes on B flat.  Charles Rosen points out the humor :

There are two measures of one note softly repeated by the cello, a tonic pedal.  This is a charming joke: Op. 50 no. 1 is the first of the quartets written for the King of Prussia, who was a cellist.  Accordingly the set opens with the cello all by itself, playing a motif hardly taxing to the royal virtuosity – a solo on one note.

The next two measures are the key to my understanding of the movement.  In Haydn, as Rosen points out, everything comes from the theme : out of the character of the theme and its possibilities of development arises the shape of the musical discourse. The quartet plays in measures 3-4 a musical figure which Haydn’s audience would have immediately recognized as a cadential figure, a closing/ending motion.  It is like he is cleverly winking at the listener and beginning his story with “The End”.  An eighteenth century ear would have made this “topical association”, and once I did I could recognize the playfulness of the movement.  The ear would expect to hear the violin figure in moving down in sequence twice to a perfect authentic cadence in the tonic. Instead, Haydn moves the musical motive upwards and spends the movement combining and expanding the combination of the cello repeated note figure and the violin’s cadential figure.  The movement is in a Sonata form: monothematic, but having an exposition/development/recapitulation, movement from the tonic to the dominant and tonal resolution in the recapitulation.  What the movement is really about however, is the five minutes or so of anticipation, expectation and delayed gratification as Haydn plays all around this closing figure and finally delivers satisfaction in the final 15 measures, where we hear the closing figure as we expected it to go, AT LAST.  Much more was revealed to me by hearing the inside joke and this element of delayed gratification than was revealed in labeling the exposition, arrival of the dominant harmony, development and recapitulation.  All of those elements are in the music, but I don’t think I heard what Haydn intended or how his contemporaries heard the work until I realized the meaning in the opening four measures.

Here is the full four movement quartet by Haydn, with what I assume is a painting of the King of Prussia and his entourage.

 

 

 

Posted in Classical Music, Piano and Chamber Music | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Phorion (1967)

This piece by Lukas Foss (1922-2009) is fifty years old, but somehow captures exactly how it sometimes feels inside my head.

 

You can hear the world broadcast premiere of Phorion from 1967, performed by the New York Philharmonic conducted by Leonard Berstein in this second video.  It is followed by a interview with Lukas Foss, the composer, speaking about the work.

Posted in Classical Music | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Tintinnabuli

From Merriam-Webster dictionary:

tintinnabulation:  the sound of ringing bells

I didn’t really intend on having a summer sabbatical from blogging, but that is how it seems to have turned out.  On the positive side, I did take the time to build a lot of stuff, including a large L-shaped desk from where I can write lots of things to put on this blog.


The first score that I reviewed while listening to music at my new workstation was the Symphony No. 4, “Los Angeles”,  by Estonian composer Arvo Pärt.  The work was composed in 2008, and received its premiere in January of 2009.  I’ll bet that even if you have never heard the name Arvo Pärt before today, you can guess which city’s Philharmonic Orchestra performed the work at that concert.  Today the ink is hardly even dry on the score, at a mere 8 years since its creation, especially compared to some of the works which are on orchestra concert programs.  The work was a joint commission from the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association, its conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen, the Canberra International Music Festival, and the Sydney Conservatorium of Music.  It is the association with Los Angeles, the city of Angels, that the composer made significant.  Pärt uses an ancient Russian Orthodox canon called “The Canon of the Guardian Angel” as a foundation for the work.

Arvo

Arvo Pärt

The piece stands out to me in a couple of different ways.  First, it is an actual 21st century symphony composed by a living composer, which should garner our attention.  Contemporary works should speak to us deeper than any other, as they are a reflection of the times we live in.  The key word in that last sentence is “should”, as the sad truth of the 20th century in “classical” music is that all too often the composer didn’t seem to care if anyone listened.  In many cases, no one did, and orchestras went on happily playing old warhorses that were comfortable for audiences to hear. Second, it is the first symphony that Pärt had composed in 37 long years.  He had mainly been working with small vocal ensembles and choruses.  His previous symphony, his Third, was a transitional work written in 1971.  There is a definite change of style in the compositions of Mr. Pärt.  After a period of intense study of ancient music and chant, he began composing in a radically different style he developed and called “Tintinnabuli”.  Most of his compositions since 1977, and many of his most well-known works, are written in this style.  To the best of my knowledge, Symphony 4 is one of the few large-scale instrumental works he has written in this style.

A quote from Wikipedia is as good of a concise description of the style as any I have seen:

“Tintinnabuli (singular. tintinnabulum; from the Latin tintinnabulum, “a bell”) is a compositional style created by the Estonian composer Arvo Pärt, introduced in his Für Alina (1976), and used again in Spiegel im Spiegel (1978). This simple style was influenced by the composer’s mystical experiences with chant music. Musically, Pärt’s tintinnabular music is characterized by two types of voice, the first of which (dubbed the “tintinnabular voice”) arpeggiates the tonic triad, and the second of which moves diatonically in stepwise motion. The works often have a slow and meditative tempo, and a minimalist approach to both notation and performance. Pärt’s compositional approach has expanded somewhat in the years since 1970, but the overall effect remains largely the same.”

The overall effect is one of stillness, with motion that is only glacial in speed.  There are slight tensions in the music, but they always resolve, small dissonances that move to a consonance.  This is music of great subtlety, slowly building peaks and warm waves of sound.  I generally do not promote the “warm bath” approach to listening, just letting the music wash over you like warm water in the bath, but that seems to be the best way to experience the Symphony No. 4.  The music is meditative and hypnotic, slowly unfolding and enveloping the listener.

Arvo Pärt is so original in his creations that there is almost nothing to compare his music to.  Perhaps a selection of contrasting music would be the most revealing.  Here is the opening track to the John Coltrane album “Sun Ship”, recorded in 1965 and posthumously released.  It is one of the last recording of the “classic” Coltrane quartet with Elvin Jones on Drums, McCoy Tyner on piano and Jimmy Garrison on bass.  At this point in his life, Coltrane was as deeply spiritual man as has ever put shoe to concrete.  Equally as spiritual and interested in the mystical as Arvo Pärt, but the frenetic, harsh, screeching sounds of this track is the complete opposite of the sound of our Estonian friend.

 John Coltrane – Sun Ship

(As an aside, I once had a close friend and teacher that would use this track to go into electronic stores and test out different speakers.  Imagine the reaction of unsuspecting shoppers who had this sound invading their shopping experience on a random Tuesday evening!)

The spirituality of the Pärt Symphony No. 4 is the other end of the spectrum.  It is scored for string orchestra, harp, timpani, and percussion, written in three slow movements that last a total of about 39 minutes in performance.  Where Coltrane tries to play the entire overtone series at once, Pärt lives in the area of fourths, fifths and triads.  Where Coltrane is a jet engine, the music of Pärt is floating on air.  Where “Sun Ship” is cathartic, the Pärt Symphony has been described as a mournful, introspective lament (although I don’t necessarily consider sorrow to be the major emotional expression of the work).  Two completely different modes of expression from two equally spiritual men.  I find both important to me.

Arvo Pärt,  Symphony No. 4, “Los Angeles”

 

 

Posted in Classical Music, Symphonies | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments